Who is Bigger in Native Son?

     In "How Bigger Was Born" Richard Wright talks very explicitly about how he views Native Son's Bigger Thomas as a composite of many people that he has known and observed over the course of his life. He discusses at length their various qualities and the ways that he thinks they all exemplify what he was trying to communicate through Bigger in Native Son. For me, this supplement was definitely the most clarifying part of the book in reference to Bigger's character, and it was really interesting to read that after reading and discussing the book. 

    Reading Wright's description of who this character is and what his existence means is a very different experience from reading the book itself. Bigger means something much more expansive and far-reaching to Wright personally than just the character in this book. He is the culmination of many years of observation of the behavior of huge numbers of people, almost a theory of human nature in some ways. Wright says, "I made the discovery that Bigger Thomas was not black all the time; he was white, too, and there were literally millions of him, everywhere. The extension of my sense of the personality of Bigger was the pivot of my life; it altered the complexion of my existence" (Wright, 441). It is clear that this character and theory mean much more than any real person ever could. Bigger has been almost mythologized here. Wright even explicitly refers to Bigger as a "symbol" twice in this essay (441 and 447, although the second mention is confusing and without the context of several paragraphs it seems like Wright is saying that Bigger is not a symbol). 

    In class, one of the main themes that we talked about with this book was the way that Bigger's environment essentially controls him, or at least controls his options. I think that this is definitely a significant part of Wright's vision for this character, but there is a lot more to Wright's vision here than can really be seen without his supplemental commentary. Bigger is primarily a symbolic character on every possible level. He is treated as a symbol by the white people who portray his life and story in the most racist light possible, but also by Max, who would defend him by saying that he is a representative of an entire group, and explicitly highlighting the optics of his case and what the decision would mean for a whole community. But on a meta-level, he is treated as a symbol by Wright himself, for the way that racism impacts people, yes, but also for a certain type of resistance to it, and a lot more. Bigger carries a lot of symbolic weight for Wright in this novel, as you can tell through the detail with which he is able to name all of his influences so methodically. But on another level, forcing Bigger to contain these contradictory ideas means that he acts as a screen onto which people project whatever narrative they want to tell through his story. "When they approach [him] they see only [his] surroundings, themselves, or figments of their imagination--indeed, everything and anything except [him]" (Ellison, 3). Bigger, through the pressure exerted on him by not just outside forces but even the book itself, becomes, in many ways, an Invisible Man

Comments

  1. I think you communicated well what kind of character Bigger really is. I agree with you that there definitely is more to Bigger than just a specific character, there are many examples of big societal issues that are projected onto him. Bigger is more than just a random guy in the story, he represents more than that. I also liked the quotes you chose and I think this is a really good post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with you that Bigger is used as a symbol. The fact that we never hear Bigger's point of view on anything, since there is some other narrator telling the story, leaves us wondering who Bigger really is. Throughout the novel, he seems to just be used as a tool by other people to further their own agendas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also think that we never get a very good sense of Bigger as a character, and it leaves us with a much less personal view of him. From what we've talked about in class, everyone seems to have really strong opinions on him that are more one-dimensional than you would expect, and I think it's because he feels more like a symbol or a representation of so many people rather than just one person.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you organized your blog post and cited direct evidence from the text to back your claim. My favorite part of the book is 'How Bigger Was Born' because in this part, Wright explains where Bigger comes from and the real people Bigger was born from. However, although Bigger is definitely symbolic, I never thought of him as a myth. Personally, I know people who resemble Bigger, so I was able to connect with Wright's creation of Bigger easier. Bigger represents the lives of many black men in America and his environmental represents the conditions that create a Bigger Thomas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I found Wright's description of Bigger's inspiration quite interesting -- that there are millions of Biggers, which is a much more bold statement than what I expected, which is that one or more people inspired Bigger. But that raises some questions for me, like: millions of people can't be all THAT similar - they'd just share some key characteristics - so is Bigger's personality and existence just some key characteristics? Does that rob him of any individuality? (I think so, and I think that even though we learn so much about Bigger, he purposefully doesn't have many unique characteristics.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Reading this blog post I wonder if you would consider Wright's portrayal of Bigger as a success? By making Bigger a contradictory symbol for blackness does Wright lose his message somewhere inside the ambiguity of Bigger's character? And if not, what message do you think Wright ultimately leaves us with as readers? I think it's especially interesting that you draw Ellison's description of Invisible Man's narrator into the end of your analysis. Perhaps by being dissolved into purely racial symbolism, Bigger completely ceases to exist, sending no message at all except the message we choose to see in the invisible void.

    ReplyDelete
  7. omg Rowan this is so deep! I have a lot of issues with Richard Wright's writing and character depictions but he did think through his depiction of Bigger. I think "Bigger carries ... so methodically" is a really interesting line because it shows how much care Wright put into Bigger, at least. (I can't say the same for Bessie). Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Families belonging to each other in Beloved

The Okeechobee Hurricane

Esther's story is really not universal and I kind of like that